Monday, January 8, 2007
PeaceMaker
As the title suggest, it is a different type of "war" game. Simplifying the Israeli/Palestinian conflict into a win-able game can show you how foolishly ignorant one can be of such a hot and complex topic.
When I played the test version recently I lost several times in the begining. However the more losses I racked up the more understanding I gained. And by the time I won on the easy setting a rush came over me.
Usually when I win a game I get a rush of domination. This time my hairs stood on end with a mild ecstasy of enlightenment. Breaking the cycle of violence as political leader was a completely different rush.
Their website has links to articles written by Time magazine, New York Times, BBC, Washington Post and many other news outlets. Also they have a compelling video to watch.
Anyway I'm proud to be editing the content of this game. It's a small part but hopefully it'll add some value to the experience.
This is also the reason I'm not able to post as much as I'd like. However, they are helping build a network of socially responsible organizations and individuals. These contact will probably helpful in my current journalistic project.
Esoteric Rantings on School News
I don't believe this will be "the" website for those who want to radically change their schools. This is not a call to activism. This is not the life blood of the community. Even the most avid media junky spends a few minutes a day consuming one form of news. This will probably not be monumental to any individual much less to our society.
Maybe this site will be like a rare but reoccuring dream to people. Mostly insignifcant to your everyday reality. Something that hangs in the back of your mind and might inform you of some strange working of your brian. Perhaps, once in a blue moon someone will look at this website and be informed of the strange workings of the public school system.
The school system is like trying to understand why there is war. There are too many reasons for one person to understand the complexties of such a massive social undertaking.
But trying to understand is better than living in complete ingnorance. Maybe those dreams are trying to tell you something.
Tuesday, January 2, 2007
New Media's Future as History
You have a few minutes before a meeting. So, you turn on your portable computer and follow-up on the story. At that moment the reporter happens to be online so you IM him a question. A minute later he responds and can tell you a few links that has that information but doesn't know personally. You save the message for later.
A couple of days later, right before bed, you read a story or few links or heated discussions on the topic or watch an archived video podcast of the last PTA meeting.
This person writes his opinion backed up by some facts thet they found in a different field that's relevant, like psychology.
A week later a person emails him some comments about the posting. They dialogue about it either in private or public. Then they reach both gain some insight to the another perspective.
Perhaps on other days the person tuned into national politics, international news, the on-going war or some other topic that generally has a beat or an editor.
This might be a way people use media.
There would be stories written from professional reporters as well as students, parents, teachers, principals and others. Stories on a particular or related topic that gives multiple perspectives.
A person that hosts a live video news show once a day on local education. A chat room to discuss with other readers real time on the important issue for the nest school board election. Links to official government documents about spending and law. And these documents would have analysis from different sources. A discussion board on all topics.
The one way broadcast of news from the rich and powerfull is ending. You Tube and My Space might later be We Tube and Our Space. It also might compel the government to have more openness in their records by developing a culture that demands online twenty-four hour access.
Now we save all this stuff and it now becomes a first draft of history. A more detailed and inclusive account that the future can use. The archiving of this data is invaluable to future generations.
The news as well as history can now be written by everyone not just the winners.
School Reporting by Students
Imagine a reporter at our schools telling us what goes on inside the school house gates. Stories not just about the budget or some controversial student expulsion or teacher misconduct. We might actually learn about the day to day running of the school.
But is it possible? What will be the quality of reporting? Won't it be biased? And thousands of other questions. I believe it is possible to some degree and an worthy experiment on democracy.
One question I hope to obviate is, "Won't this be like rate my Teacher?" No, because I will try to moderate and edit it. Isn't that censorship? Yes an no. In the same way an editor censors his reporters, minimally.
I will attempt to post all stories from student reporters. However, I will attempt to put them into some order either by technology or personal judgement. In other words, stories that are contain libelous or defamatory statement would have to be edited, just like traditional journalism. However if the story is just of poor reliability or structure it might just go into the "back pages."
This is a suggestion and I want to see what your opinions might be? I will personally respond and post all questions and comments to evolve the discussion.
Saturday, December 30, 2006
Constitutional Blueprint and the Tangled Threads
All organizations and every nation require guiding principles. Rules that are more principled than the mere will of fickle humans. We agree to make laws that prevent power from tuning into tyranny. That includes the tyranny of the majority.
Local Educational News will also require a constitution. The editors, reporters, financiers and other individual must swear to obey the principles that will inform and empower the public. In turn the public must also respect the rights of individual and minorities in their expression of opinion and ideas.
The forum for this journalistic experiment will try to be open marketplace of ideas. A marketplace where media monopoly owned by elites will be dismantled by the quality of the ideas. Ideas will be rise to the top by virtue of its merits not by financial dominance.
As I write this I am visiting my family. The adults are watching TV and 10 nephew and nieces are playing with new toys. The parents all tired from work and relaxing for the holidays. I feel that most people cannot spare the time or energy to read about their schools much less participate in writing about their schools.
While talking to my cousin about education, he said, “It’s all to overwhelming.” And he is right. National, state and local regulations combined with sociological and cultural phenomena can only be penetrated with a great deal of work.
But this is why I want this project to succeed. I want this information to be more accessible and consumable, yet not dumb-downed. That way we can talk about education. If there can be meaningful dialogue then there might be meaningful progress.
Ironically, all the adult members of my family have a degree and most have a graduate degree. I shudder to think how people with fewer resources can cope with educational decisions.
So what does this have to do with a constitution? Nothing really. But untangling the massive ball of education I begin to realize there is more than one thread.
I don’t want to be the sole author of a constitution for several reasons. The main reason is that I cannot do it alone. The other reason is that it would completely contradictory to the spirit of the project.
So here is this fledgling project with nothing to guide us, but this the exciting part. This is where we can use our intellect and creativity. Sometime soon I will actively try to engage people I know who might be willing to help.
Hopefully soon my monologue will end.
Constitutional Blueprint and the Tangled Threads
All organizations and every nation require guiding principles. Rules that are more principled than the mere will of fickle humans. We agree to make laws that prevent power from tuning into tyranny. That includes the tyranny of the majority.
Local Educational News will also require a constitution. The editors, reporters, financiers and other individual must swear to obey the principles that will inform and empower the public. In turn the public must also respect the rights of individual and minorities in their expression of opinion and ideas.
The forum for this journalistic experiment will try to be open marketplace of ideas. A marketplace where media monopoly owned by elites will be dismantled by the quality of the ideas. Ideas will be rise to the top by virtue of its merits not by financial dominance.
As I write this I am visiting my family are watching TV and 10 nephew and nieces are playing with new toys. The parents all tired from work and relaxing for the holidays. I feel that most people cannot spare the time or energy to read about their schools much less participate in writing about their schools.
While talking to my cousin about education, he said, “It’s all to overwhelming.” And he is right. National, state and local regulations combined with sociological and cultural phenomena can only be penetrated with a great deal of work.
But this is why I want this project to succeed. I want this information to be more accessible and consumable, yet not dumb-downed. That way we can talk about education. If there can be meaningful dialogue then there might be meaningful progress.
Ironically, all the adult members of my family have a degree and most have a graduate degree. I shudder to think how people with fewer resources can cope with educational decisions.
So what does this have to do with a constitution? Nothing really. But untangling the massive ball of education I begin to realize there is more than one thread.
I don’t want to be the sole author of a constitution for several reasons. The main reason is that I cannot do it alone.
The funny thing is that we will need to set some ground rules for making the rules. Any suggestions?
Next week I’ll propose some of my own.
Thursday, December 28, 2006
Persistence in Reporting
Thus far this blog has little useful information for the public regarding education.
But first, I wanted to make transparent the journalistic style. I still have much work to do on that front. By making the journalistic process clear for others as well as myself I hope to make the information that we gather useful and relevant.
Some of the information that we need is budget information and curriculum. These two pieces are vital. The information is out there somewhere. But it'll be buried in reports and hard to penetrate. This data will also need a context that will take much more research and reporting from us.
Persistence is key to gathering this information. Furthermore it will not be in vain. The information will be relevant for a long time. It will at least give us a historic context as we move forward.
So I implore you to go out and do some reporting. I'll read it with care and respond to your individual work. This dialogue is also a crucial component. Hopefully we can all participate in this dialogue.
There are many restrictions to a fluid form of conversation but in time I believe we will overcome this barriers by new technologies and hopefully elegant social solutions. But persistence is key.